Check users, recentchangescleanup, Administrators
1,248
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
:I restructured the records already a bit and tried to cluster within "topics". I would not go the path of relevance as it is very subjective thing. And the general idea that "this record is more important than another one" seems to point in a direction of (de)preciating records and might set a negativ discussion culture.--[[User:Korn|Korn]] ([[User talk:Korn|talk]]) 19:42, 22 September 2015 (CEST)
Your words. But often it comes just down to doing it. No discussion is most efficicent and it excludes a negatively biased discussion too ;) --[[User:Fverhart|Fverhart]] ([[User talk:Fverhart|talk]]) 19:57, 22 September 2015 (CEST)
== Irrelevant part of World Record ==
