2,223
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
: My proposal is to switch to Creative Commons completely. Does anybody disagree? If not, I will do this some time in July. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 14:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
::I agree with this change (double licensing as in WP)--[[User:Kimdime69|Kimdime69]] 19:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
:::Sorry, for being not clear enough. I prefer CC-only and completely dropping GFDL. Otherwise we would need to mark each articles according to the licence.
:::If we copy stuff from CC or GFDL sites, it can't be double licensed. I think that's too much hassle for most users (even I don't want to do that).
:::If wikipedia switches to CC, I guess there won't be many GFDL sites left anyway. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 20:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
