Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sellig"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks for your addition to [[Brno]], but if advice on the page is no longer reliable, don't just add new text under it saying "ATTENTION!!!" Instead, rewriting the pre-existing content completely to reflect the new situation. Otherwise, articles just become a confusing mess of outdated and new advice. [[User:CRCulver|CRCulver]] ([[User talk:CRCulver|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | Thanks for your addition to [[Brno]], but if advice on the page is no longer reliable, don't just add new text under it saying "ATTENTION!!!" Instead, rewriting the pre-existing content completely to reflect the new situation. Otherwise, articles just become a confusing mess of outdated and new advice. [[User:CRCulver|CRCulver]] ([[User talk:CRCulver|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, '''please''' don't write in first person on Hitchwiki ("The situation might be back as before so I leave the upper part"). On a community-edited site like a wiki, it is not clear who "I" is, so we have to keep everything in a neutral, third-person tone. [[User:CRCulver|CRCulver]] ([[User talk:CRCulver|talk]]) 20:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:00, 16 September 2014
Thanks for your addition to Brno, but if advice on the page is no longer reliable, don't just add new text under it saying "ATTENTION!!!" Instead, rewriting the pre-existing content completely to reflect the new situation. Otherwise, articles just become a confusing mess of outdated and new advice. CRCulver (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Also, please don't write in first person on Hitchwiki ("The situation might be back as before so I leave the upper part"). On a community-edited site like a wiki, it is not clear who "I" is, so we have to keep everything in a neutral, third-person tone. CRCulver (talk) 20:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
