6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
== New structure of South towards - doubts ==
I'd like to discuss my doubts in connection to my recent changes to a "South towards" section: [http://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Graz&diff=prev&oldid=89843 link to diff I'm talking about].
1. Is this structure readable and better than the previous one? Also, is it consistent with good wiki etiquette?
2. As you may have noticed, I've split [[User:Martinsltopf|Martinsltopf]]'s personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - [[User:Raczek|Raczek]] ([[User talk:Raczek|talk]]) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
I'd like to discuss my doubts in connection to my recent changes to a "South towards" section: [http://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Graz&diff=prev&oldid=89843 link to diff I'm talking about].
1. Is this structure readable and better than the previous one? Also, is it consistent with good wiki etiquette?
2. As you may have noticed, I've split [[User:Martinsltopf|Martinsltopf]]'s personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - [[User:Raczek|Raczek]] ([[User talk:Raczek|talk]]) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
