Difference between revisions of "Talk:WWOOF"

From Hitchwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
WWOOF is a good organization but I see quite some lack of any appreciable connection with hitchhiking, and therefore would vote for the deletion of this article. --[[User:Sigurdas|Sigurdas]] 10:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 
WWOOF is a good organization but I see quite some lack of any appreciable connection with hitchhiking, and therefore would vote for the deletion of this article. --[[User:Sigurdas|Sigurdas]] 10:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 
: Indeed. Then again, it might be worth to at least mention it. [[User:Ataqlibert|Halan]] from hitchwiki.org/pt proposed making a site called something like [[Work on the Road]]. Maybe we can make that here too. WWOOF could be one chapter there. What do you think? --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 11:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 
: Indeed. Then again, it might be worth to at least mention it. [[User:Ataqlibert|Halan]] from hitchwiki.org/pt proposed making a site called something like [[Work on the Road]]. Maybe we can make that here too. WWOOF could be one chapter there. What do you think? --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 11:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
: Actually, I was waiting for something like this on this wiki. WWOOF is something connected to a hitchhiking lifestyle and therefore I think it deserves a place here, alongside hospitality exchange information, etc. I don't see a limit either to the type of organisations. --[[User:Robino|Robino]] 18:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
:: What is 'a [[hitchhiking lifestyle]]'? --[[User:Alex|Alex]] 10:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
::: Good question. Let me just reformulate it differently: There are quite some hitchhikers who also use WWOO. So IMHO, just like there is a page on [[hospitality]] networks here, a guide about hitchhiking should also have something about WWOOF --[[User:Robino|Robino]] 19:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:08, 21 January 2009

WWOOF is a good organization but I see quite some lack of any appreciable connection with hitchhiking, and therefore would vote for the deletion of this article. --Sigurdas 10:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. Then again, it might be worth to at least mention it. Halan from hitchwiki.org/pt proposed making a site called something like Work on the Road. Maybe we can make that here too. WWOOF could be one chapter there. What do you think? --MrTweek 11:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I was waiting for something like this on this wiki. WWOOF is something connected to a hitchhiking lifestyle and therefore I think it deserves a place here, alongside hospitality exchange information, etc. I don't see a limit either to the type of organisations. --Robino 18:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
What is 'a hitchhiking lifestyle'? --Alex 10:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Good question. Let me just reformulate it differently: There are quite some hitchhikers who also use WWOO. So IMHO, just like there is a page on hospitality networks here, a guide about hitchhiking should also have something about WWOOF --Robino 19:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)