Difference between revisions of "Talk:Istanbul"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
those | those | ||
::I'd actually propose to leave a place for bad spots, just describe them briefly in one heading. Will probably save people time. And will avoid those spots being added back again. It's probably a good idea in general, to leave space for bad spots, sometimes I ask my hosts what spot they recommend and sometimes those spots are bad, it'd be nice to see that immediately when looking at a Hitchwiki page. [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 15:25, 19 October 2010 (CEST) | ::I'd actually propose to leave a place for bad spots, just describe them briefly in one heading. Will probably save people time. And will avoid those spots being added back again. It's probably a good idea in general, to leave space for bad spots, sometimes I ask my hosts what spot they recommend and sometimes those spots are bad, it'd be nice to see that immediately when looking at a Hitchwiki page. [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 15:25, 19 October 2010 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I'd agree that all spots be kept. It's better to have more options—not only for picking the nearest spot (or the spot easiest to get to from where you are—Istanbul's traffic is generally absurdly congested), but also for picking the right spot depending on what you exactly want to do (i.e., hitch for an hour while you're in the city to spend as little money as possible; or get out of city as quickly as possible no matter how much the public transport costs). [[User:Vidimian|Vidimian]] 21:43, 23 October 2010 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 21:43, 23 October 2010
So, information added :) anything unclear? tell me! :) anymore information needed for istanbul? pictures? i deleted the photo because it already appears on the Turkey site, I hope that's okay. platschi 11:20, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
- That's awesome! Did you know you can sign using ~~~~ :) Have fun hitching in Turkey, Guaka 18:07, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Restructuring
The E80 east isn't just for Ankara, but for pretty much everywhere in Asian Turkey and the route to Georgia. Maybe better to change the heading to "East into Asia". Also, do we really need so many spots to hitch out? I say we pick one or two that works for everyone and doesn't involve kilometres of urban hitchhiking (I'd recommend Gebze, worked for me in 3 minutes). CRCulver
- Sure, feel free to change the heading. I think it's not a bad idea to have many spots, as long as all of them work well. Depending on where in Istanbul you are, you might want to chose the closest place. Istanbul is soo huge. Still, I wouldn't mind if you remove bad spots. --MrTweek 15:01, 19 October 2010 (CEST)
those
- I'd actually propose to leave a place for bad spots, just describe them briefly in one heading. Will probably save people time. And will avoid those spots being added back again. It's probably a good idea in general, to leave space for bad spots, sometimes I ask my hosts what spot they recommend and sometimes those spots are bad, it'd be nice to see that immediately when looking at a Hitchwiki page. guaka 15:25, 19 October 2010 (CEST)
- I'd agree that all spots be kept. It's better to have more options—not only for picking the nearest spot (or the spot easiest to get to from where you are—Istanbul's traffic is generally absurdly congested), but also for picking the right spot depending on what you exactly want to do (i.e., hitch for an hour while you're in the city to spend as little money as possible; or get out of city as quickly as possible no matter how much the public transport costs). Vidimian 21:43, 23 October 2010 (CEST)
