Difference between revisions of "Talk:Graz"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2. As you may have noticed, I've split [[User:Martinsltopf|Martinsltopf]]'s personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - [[User:Raczek|Raczek]] ([[User talk:Raczek|talk]]) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | 2. As you may have noticed, I've split [[User:Martinsltopf|Martinsltopf]]'s personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - [[User:Raczek|Raczek]] ([[User talk:Raczek|talk]]) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it is readable and like that you moved the personal experiences below the instructions on how to get there ;- ) --[[User:N0id|N0id]] ([[User talk:N0id|talk]]) 14:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 27 October 2017
New structure of South towards - doubts
I'd like to discuss my doubts in connection to my recent changes to a "South towards" section: link to diff I'm talking about.
1. Is this structure readable and better than the previous one? Also, is it consistent with good wiki etiquette?
2. As you may have noticed, I've split Martinsltopf's personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - Raczek (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
I think it is readable and like that you moved the personal experiences below the instructions on how to get there ;- ) --N0id (talk) 14:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
