Difference between revisions of "Talk:First time hitchhiking"

From Hitchwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I agree... what is the purpose of the "virgin" paragraph? Can we just get rid of it? Does anyone actually hope to lose their virginity while hitchhiking? It doesn't seem to be communicating very well and has very ambiguous intent. --[[User:24.9.125.18|24.9.125.18]] 18:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 
I agree... what is the purpose of the "virgin" paragraph? Can we just get rid of it? Does anyone actually hope to lose their virginity while hitchhiking? It doesn't seem to be communicating very well and has very ambiguous intent. --[[User:24.9.125.18|24.9.125.18]] 18:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
I was close to making the title of my new hitchhiking blog 'A Virgin Hitchhiker'.
 +
I've never hitchhiked before, but I'm pretty sure I'm no longer a virgin.

Revision as of 17:49, 9 August 2007

Is it a good idea to call a neo in hitchhiking a "virgin"? As we can see the first editor other than the creator of the wiki added some notes which have a very double meaning. They put the reader to think on hitchhiking in a very negative way. Before I started reading this I had hope though to see something about Richard Branson here.

All the best Frank Verhart


I agree... what is the purpose of the "virgin" paragraph? Can we just get rid of it? Does anyone actually hope to lose their virginity while hitchhiking? It doesn't seem to be communicating very well and has very ambiguous intent. --24.9.125.18 18:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I was close to making the title of my new hitchhiking blog 'A Virgin Hitchhiker'. I've never hitchhiked before, but I'm pretty sure I'm no longer a virgin.