Difference between revisions of "Hitchwiki talk:Organization (old stuff)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* May someone outline the responsilities an organization would take over if they present themself as Legal Board of Htichwiki.org? It s just about having someone paying the Domain? Is it about having a legal Organisation backing up Hitchwiki.org? [[User:Fabzgy|Fabzgy]] 16:33, 10 September 2007 (CEST) | * May someone outline the responsilities an organization would take over if they present themself as Legal Board of Htichwiki.org? It s just about having someone paying the Domain? Is it about having a legal Organisation backing up Hitchwiki.org? [[User:Fabzgy|Fabzgy]] 16:33, 10 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
: It is about having a legal organisation to back it up. At the moment I pay the domain, and I will probably continue doing this at least for a while. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 17:42, 10 September 2007 (CEST) | : It is about having a legal organisation to back it up. At the moment I pay the domain, and I will probably continue doing this at least for a while. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 17:42, 10 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --------- | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Would Option 1 mean that the wiki belongs to BV completely? | ||
| + | : Both sounds good, but in any case I would like to keep it on my server, to have more control about it (I don't think I could get shell access to the BV-Server; Could I?) | ||
| + | : In any case, I prefer the abgefahren-solution. I'll think about it, and let's see what others say --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 23:29, 11 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don t think so. I don t think anyone in BV wants to make our server more busy. BV would probably very welcome it if you keep the wiki on your Server. It s more about a APT (Schnittstelle) between the Travelguide wiki of BW and the HW. | ||
| + | This we we would have BeWelcome Memember editing your database. Probably completing it with new information. | ||
| + | This could as well be done if HW decides to coohse Abgefahren e.V. as a roof organisation. [[User:Fabzgy|Fabzgy]] 00:08, 12 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 12 September 2007
- May someone outline the responsilities an organization would take over if they present themself as Legal Board of Htichwiki.org? It s just about having someone paying the Domain? Is it about having a legal Organisation backing up Hitchwiki.org? Fabzgy 16:33, 10 September 2007 (CEST)
- It is about having a legal organisation to back it up. At the moment I pay the domain, and I will probably continue doing this at least for a while. --MrTweek 17:42, 10 September 2007 (CEST)
- Would Option 1 mean that the wiki belongs to BV completely?
- Both sounds good, but in any case I would like to keep it on my server, to have more control about it (I don't think I could get shell access to the BV-Server; Could I?)
- In any case, I prefer the abgefahren-solution. I'll think about it, and let's see what others say --MrTweek 23:29, 11 September 2007 (CEST)
I don t think so. I don t think anyone in BV wants to make our server more busy. BV would probably very welcome it if you keep the wiki on your Server. It s more about a APT (Schnittstelle) between the Travelguide wiki of BW and the HW. This we we would have BeWelcome Memember editing your database. Probably completing it with new information. This could as well be done if HW decides to coohse Abgefahren e.V. as a roof organisation. Fabzgy 00:08, 12 September 2007 (CEST)
