New structure of South towards - doubts
I'd like to discuss my doubts in connection to my recent changes to a "South towards" section: link to diff I'm talking about.
1. Is this structure readable and better than the previous one? Also, is it consistent with good wiki etiquette?
2. As you may have noticed, I've split Martinsltopf's personal experience, as it contained three different parts: Spot 1A experience, directions to Spot 1B and Spot 1B experience. I wasn't feeling comfortable splitting someone's quotation. Is it acceptable? If so, is it acceptable the way I did it? - Raczek (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)